AI and The Smart Building Revolution

Thought leadership

AI and The Smart Building Revolution

The Brain Behind the Walls

Female electrician checks control panel with tablet

January 30, 2026

Suhail Y. Tayeb and Amy Myers Jaffe

Tags
Center for Global Affairs

This essay is adapted from a forthcoming book manuscript and is shared in draft form for conference discussion. Let’s pull back the curtain on what a building really is today. The smart building revolution has moved building design and construction forward beyond steel, glass, and cement. A building, at its most advanced, is becoming a live system - one that thinks, predicts, adapts, and self-corrects. The material physical structure is still there, of course, and from the outside, might look like a typical building from the past. But the latest buildings are now equipped with a nervous system of code. Sensors embedded in ceilings and ducts monitor the air. Algorithms adjust the temperature before anyone notices it has changed. Lighting systems learn when to dim and where to brighten. Water use is tracked by the second. Carbon intensity is calculated in real time. Increasingly, large commercial and residential buildings are upgrading building management systems, utilizing AI to reduce energy and water use, improve indoor air quality and consistent temperature control, and lower operating costs. Advanced energy management systems combine sensors that measure occupancy with predictive analytics that forecasts peak energy usage and can shift non-essential load to off-peak hours. Sensors allow building systems to understand occupancy trends in real time and allow for activation of smart zone thermostats that can lower heating or cooling in unoccupied areas or reduce the number of elevators operating in large high-rise buildings. HVAC systems can be calibrated to pre-cool buildings ahead of forecasted heat waves to lower energy costs. Simultaneously, smart lighting systems use sensors and automated controls to adjust lighting based on natural light trends and occupancy. Smart window shading systems respond to sun angles to avoid glare and reduce heating in summer months. The impact of AI on energy efficiency, for example, can be quite dramatic. One recent study found that applications for AI in occupancy influence, control and operations, and design and construction could lower the energy footprint of medium size office buildings by 8 percent to 19 percent over the coming three decades.1 Other studies have suggested that AI-based methods for automating control and assessment of thermal comfort levels in buildings could lead to significant energy savings.2 The smartest buildings no longer wait for someone to complain. They respond before the problem surfaces. A vibration in a chiller can trigger a maintenance ticket before it becomes a breakdown. A spike in carbon dioxide during a staff meeting can prompt a fan system to quietly activate. These are no longer futuristic concepts. They are becoming baseline expectations. This shift is subtle in form but radical in function. It turns a building from a static shell into an active participant in its own efficiency. Operational teams move from reacting to anticipating. Investors and tenants see performance not as a guess or a lagging report, but as a living metric. Real estate is no longer defined only by location or design. It is now defined by intelligence. This is not about software upgrades or dashboard aesthetics. It is about rethinking what the building is for and how it proves its value every single hour it operates. The building has a brain now. Increasingly, that brain is what sets it apart. From Reactive to Predictive Most buildings used to operate on a kind of blind routine. Systems were serviced on a fixed schedule. Filters were changed every few months whether they needed it or not. Problems revealed themselves through complaints or breakdowns. It was a world of reacting, putting out fires instead of preventing them. That is changing. Today, the most advanced buildings are learning how to see ahead. Machine learning models analyze performance patterns in real time. They detect subtle anomalies long before they become failures. An HVAC system that begins to draw more power or cycle irregularly is flagged, not by a technician doing rounds, but by software that has already mapped what normal looks like and knows when the baseline shifts. Predictive maintenance is replacing manual oversight. Instead of waiting for a chiller to fail on the hottest day of the year, the system warns the team two weeks earlier that compressor performance is declining. Instead of discovering that a ventilation system is underperforming during an indoor air quality audit, sensors log airflow data every minute and feed it into models that understand what healthy looks like. These systems do not just trigger alarms. They provide insight, pointing to the root of the issue before anyone even knows to ask the question. This shift is not about efficiency for its own sake. It is about avoiding disruption, cutting energy waste, and preserving tenant comfort without overengineering the fix. When done well, predictive operations make buildings quieter, safer, cheaper, and more resilient. The building becomes less of a machine that breaks down and more of an organism that takes care of itself. That is not a technical detail. It is a new way of thinking about asset management. Optimization in Real Time Imagine walking into a building that already knows what kind of day it is going to be. Not just in terms of weather, but in terms of occupancy, energy demand, and grid pressure. It knows how many people are expected on each floor, which conference rooms will fill up, what time the sun will hit the west-facing glass, and how much local utilities will charge for electricity in the late afternoon. It uses all of that to make decisions, second by second, to keep the building running smoothly and efficiently. This is not science fiction. This is optimization in real time. It is what happens when artificial intelligence stops being a reporting tool and starts acting like an operational partner. Lighting systems adjust not just based on motion sensors, but on predictive patterns of use and daylight availability. HVAC does not simply turn on when the first person walks in. It ramps up gradually based on forecasted occupancy and outside temperatures. Shading systems respond to sun angles before glare becomes a problem. Battery storage charges when rates are low and discharges when demand peaks. These systems are not automating what humans used to do manually. They are making decisions that were never possible before, because no single person or even team could synthesize that much data in real time. A traditional facilities manager might know when peak load hits the building. A smart system knows how to flatten that peak by anticipating it and distributing load across the day. It knows when to pull from the grid and when to draw from the battery. It learns how tenants behave and adjusts itself without a call to the front desk. Building energy management and control systems (BEMCS) utilize a combination of sensors, meters, controllers, and software to coordinate how a building uses energy. The sensors collect data on temperature, occupancy, and energy use and then controllers and actuation systems use algorithms to organize control systems for optimum efficiencies.3 These systems automatically monitor and optimize heating, cooling, and lighting and help building operators find and fix inefficiencies in continuous real time.4 Increasingly, BEMCS systems are enabling buildings to join utility or independent electricity aggregators programs for demand response, where the building owner or residents receive a payment for reducing usage during periods of grid stress or high time of day peak demand.5 At its most sophistication, BEMCS can manage onsite distributed renewable energy such as geothermal systems or roof top solar and facilitate battery and electric vehicle charging. AI-enabled BECMS can tap advanced analytics, predictive modeling and automation, allowing dynamic instantaneous responses to changes in weather and equipment conditions.6 Studies indicate that using an AI-driven BEMCS system can reduce energy use by 10 percent to 25 percent, enhancing operational efficiency.7  The systems executes tasks such as adjusting HVAC settings and managing equipment schedules, responding automatically to changes in occupancy, weather or time of day. For example, sensors that indicate low occupancy can trigger adjustments such as reducing the number of elevators in operation or changes in heating or cooling in unoccupied areas. This level of intelligence allows buildings to operate with precision. They no longer just react to what is happening. They shape what happens. Energy use becomes smoother. Comfort becomes more consistent. Emissions drop without sacrificing performance. All of it happens invisibly, without the user ever noticing, except in lower utility bills and more stable indoor environments. Berkeley Lab estimates that using a BEMCS system to provide monthly readouts of building energy use not only speeds reporting when required by regulators or investors, but also help building operators identify opportunities for shaving peak energy demand.8 Real-time optimization is not a luxury feature. It is quickly becoming the benchmark. Buildings that can learn and adapt on the fly will outpace those that rely on fixed schedules and blunt programming. This is where value is created, in the invisible decisions that happen every second, behind the walls, in service of a smarter, leaner, more resilient asset. The Tenant as User In the smartest buildings, the tenant is no longer just an occupant. They are a user, active, recognized, and continuously engaged. The building does not simply host them. It learns from them. It adapts to their routines, preferences, and presence the way a good digital assistant does. It creates an experience, not just a space. Lighting adjusts to preferred brightness levels based on time of day, not just zones. Temperature settings respond to personal comfort profiles, not static thermostats. Air quality sensors track carbon dioxide levels, humidity, and particulate matter, then automatically adjust airflow to maintain optimal conditions without the tenant having to file a complaint. Touchless entry systems recognize who is arriving, unlock doors, and trigger elevator calls without anyone pressing a button. This is not about luxury. It is about functionality at a new level. A smart building that responds to its users improves comfort, productivity, and retention. Employees are more likely to stay in environments where the lights are never too harsh, the air never too stale, and the temperature never swings wildly between overcooled and overheated. The space feels tailored, not generic. The tenant feels known, not anonymous. These systems do not just adapt to individuals. They learn from patterns. They track usage of shared amenities, conference rooms, restrooms, and even bike racks, feeding that data back into operational decisions. If a tenant group prefers working later hours, the building begins to optimize around that rhythm. If a certain zone is consistently underused, airflow and lighting can be scaled back automatically. Efficiency is gained without compromising experience. The building becomes a kind of silent partner, anticipating needs, smoothing frictions, and creating an environment that feels alive. Most of it is invisible. There are no blinking dashboards in every hallway. Just a system working quietly in the background, making thousands of small adjustments to support the people inside. That is what makes a building smart. Not its features, but how well it listens. Data as Asset, Liability, and Language Data is the lifeblood of smart buildings. It tells us how energy is used, how air is moving, how people are occupying space, and where systems are falling short. It makes optimization possible. It makes carbon reduction measurable. It turns performance from a marketing claim into something verifiable, auditable, and real. But data is not just an asset. It is also a liability. The same building system that learns how many people are in a room and adjusts airflow accordingly is also capturing occupancy patterns that can reveal behavior. Sensors that improve safety can also be misused to track movement. Energy logs can hint at working hours, tenant operations, and even organizational routines. As buildings get smarter, they also get more intimate. That raises hard questions about privacy, ownership, and consent. Who controls that data? Is it the landlord who installed the system? The operator who manages it? The tenant who triggers it? What happens when a new tenant moves in or a third-party vendor is brought on to optimize performance? These are not abstract legal puzzles. They are daily operational concerns. In many buildings, the rules are murky, the contracts vague, and the infrastructure fragmented. A smart building might generate terabytes of useful data, but without clear governance, that data can become a risk instead of a resource. Security adds another layer. As more systems connect to the cloud, they become vulnerable to breach. An HVAC system with an open port can become a backdoor into financial records. A lighting network might expose broader IT infrastructure. In this world, cybersecurity becomes building security. Facilities teams and IT teams must now speak the same language. That language is data. Then there is the issue of interoperability. Buildings often contain a patchwork of systems from different manufacturers and vendors. Each speaks its own dialect. Bringing those systems into a coherent conversation is difficult. Data is only useful if it can move cleanly across platforms, be visualized, acted upon, and stored securely. Without common standards or open protocols, even the smartest systems can become isolated, underused, or redundant. Despite all these challenges, data remains the foundation for everything this new generation of buildings is trying to do. It is the language buildings use to tell us how they are performing. It is the tool we rely on to track emissions, flag problems, personalize experience, and prove value. Like any language, it requires structure, agreement, and responsibility. If we want smart buildings to live up to their promise, we have to treat data not just as a technical issue, but as a strategic one. It has to be governed with care, shared with purpose, and protected with discipline. Otherwise, the very thing that gives us insight could be the thing that breaks trust. Digital Twins and Virtual Operations Now imagine if your building had a mirror, a living, digital reflection of every system behind the walls. Not just a model from the design phase, but a real-time, data-fed simulation that evolves as the building does. A digital twin is a full-scale virtual replica that lets owners and operators interact with the building without ever setting foot inside. In effect, Al algorithms combine machine learning and modeling to create a digital twin of the building’s various systems such as energy and indoor air quality. In the case of its energy system, the digital twin can be used to analyze operational data from the building to recognize patterns on how energy is used in the building, forecasts future demand based on weather and occupancy, and evaluate the effects of different kinds of energy equipment and technology.9 By creating simulations of energy demand trends under different scenarios, the digital twin enables building owners to identify opportunities to make the building more efficient and to optimize investment in systems and fuel sources. Operationally, in a digital twin, every HVAC unit, lighting circuit, airflow vent, and energy meter is represented and linked to live data. If a fan slows down in real life, it slows down in the twin. If occupancy increases on the third floor, the simulation sees it and can forecast the effects on ventilation, temperature, and energy load. It is not just passive modeling. It can provide active feedback. Operators use this technology for more than monitoring. Digital twins allow for scenario testing. What happens if you change a setpoint by three degrees during peak demand? What if you shut down an air handler for maintenance at 2 p.m. instead of 10 a.m.? The twin shows the ripple effects without risking disruption. It becomes a tool for strategy, not just reaction. Remote diagnostics take on a new dimension as well. Instead of relying on error codes and vague system alerts, operators can step inside the twin and trace anomalies across systems. A pressure drop in one duct might be tied to a change in airflow on another floor. A lag in cooling might be the downstream effect of an upstream sensor drift. The twin makes it visible, contextual, and actionable. AI can be applied to predictive maintenance. AI algorithms can be programmed to detect small anomalies in equipment operation such as changes in vibration, electric power consumption or equipment temperature and thereby predict breakdowns before they occur. Machines can literally send early warning notifications to facility managers and maintenance staff telling them when repairs need to be made, limiting downtime and avoiding time consuming disruptions in service.10 Because the model is alive, it never stops commissioning. It constantly measures performance against intent. It stays alert to drift, wear, and inefficiency. Buildings that once ran for years without reassessment can now be tuned daily. Small deviations are caught early. Savings are captured in real time. Digital twins are not about perfection. They are about precision. They give building teams the ability to operate like pilots in a cockpit, with real-time awareness of everything the asset is doing. As this technology becomes more affordable and more integrated, it is reshaping how buildings are managed, how problems are solved, and how performance is continuously improved. Not once at turnover, but every day the lights are on. Smart Buildings, Smarter Capital Smart buildings are not just better to live in or easier to run. They are beginning to outperform in a language the capital markets understand: return, resilience, and risk. For investors, a building that can track every watt, every airflow adjustment, and every system fault is not just a well-managed asset. It is a transparent one. It offers real time performance data instead of dated engineering reports. It demonstrates compliance without guesswork. In a market increasingly focused on climate exposure, regulatory pressure, and operational volatility, that kind of visibility provides a competitive edge. Underwriters are taking notice. A building with predictive maintenance and fault detection is less likely to face catastrophic equipment failure. A building with live indoor air quality monitoring and water leak sensors presents lower health and liability risk. These systems are not marketing features. They are actuarial inputs. When a building can show that it is safer, more stable, and more efficient, the numbers shift. Insurance premiums fall. Cap rates tighten. Financing terms improve. Even lenders, traditionally skeptical of operational claims, are warming up. Real time dashboards, digital twins, and carbon linked leases create a new form of underwriting infrastructure. They offer evidence, not estimates. In a capital environment where disclosure rules are tightening and sustainability metrics are becoming mainstream, that evidence matters. This is where the smart building earns its name. Not just in how it automates tasks, but in how it aligns with capital. Every system that optimizes performance also reduces exposure. Every layer of data becomes a signal to insurers, regulators, and investors that this is an asset built for the long run. In this way, technology moves from the basement to the boardroom. It becomes part of how buildings are valued, financed, and insured. The smartest buildings speak fluently in both operational performance and financial credibility. They do not just manage energy. They manage risk. They tell a story the market is learning to reward. Governance by Algorithm When a building can think for itself, when it decides how to distribute airflow, when to dim the lights, or how to shift energy load from the grid to batteries, who is in charge? That is not a philosophical question anymore. It is a governance one. The moment software begins making real time decisions, the old playbook of responsibility starts to blur. Facility managers are no longer the only ones adjusting system settings. Engineers may not be consulted before a system resets. Owners may not even know how many adjustments their building made today. The building is still theirs, but its behavior is increasingly governed by code. This shift is subtle but profound. Algorithms now balance comfort against cost, automate compliance, and fine tune systems in response to thousands of inputs. They operate faster than any human team ever could. They also introduce a new layer of opacity. What if the algorithm gets it wrong? What if energy savings come at the cost of indoor air quality? What if a tenant complains and there is no one to blame, only a dashboard? Buildings that once ran on mechanical logic are now operating as semi-autonomous systems. While they may be more efficient, they also raise hard questions. Who approves the optimization rules? Who audits the decisions? What happens when machine learning models evolve on their own, based on past data, and drift from the original intent? This is where governance has to catch up. It is no longer enough to write operational policies for humans. What’s needed is oversight structures for code and version control for optimization scripts as well as accountability chains for machine driven decisions. A performance issue triggered by an algorithm is still a performance issue. The fact that no one touched a dial does not remove responsibility. It complicates it. As buildings get smarter, ethics and governance must get sharper. Transparency, explainability, and auditability are no longer concerns for AI companies alone. They are becoming core requirements of real estate operations. In a world where software runs the building, someone still has to answer for how, and why, it made the choices it did. That raises the question about how local building inspectors and cyber defense system departments will collaborate to inspect smart buildings regularly to ensure that the algorithms can operate safely or be overridden under unusual situations like fires, blackouts, or a nefarious hacking attack. To date, fire departments and regulators in large cities such as New York have yet to fully establish updated inspection rules and procedures, potentially leaving occupants vulnerable to unusual events.11 What Gets Measured Gets Modified Ultimately, smart buildings do more than optimize systems. They can change behavior, subtly, persistently, and often without warning. The moment performance becomes visible, everything shifts. You can no longer plead ignorance about energy spikes or ventilation issues. You cannot claim surprise when comfort drops or emissions rise. The data is there. All the time. For everyone to see. This is the cultural shift that defines the smart building era. It is not just about sensors and dashboards. It is about the slow but irreversible erosion of plausible deniability. The lights were on all night. There is a log. The HVAC was cooling an empty floor. There is a chart. Someone left a window cracked in January. There is an alert. The old world of buildings ran on routine and response. Something broke, someone called. A tenant complained, someone adjusted. In this new world, the building knows before anyone else does. That knowledge changes the rules. There is nowhere to hide. Performance is no longer an annual report. It is a live feed. That level of visibility demands a new kind of trust. Tenants trust that landlords will act on data, not just collect it. Owners trust that operators will tune the building with care, not simply chase metrics. Everyone learns to rely on the system, but also to watch the system. What gets measured gets modified, and in smart buildings, everything gets measured. This is where culture becomes the differentiator. The smartest buildings are not just wired differently. They are managed differently. The teams that thrive embrace data as feedback, not surveillance. They see transparency as a tool for improvement, not exposure. They understand the building as a shared responsibility, where performance is everyone’s business. Technology sets the stage. Culture decides what happens next. The buildings that lead will be the ones where data does not just flow. It drives decisions, sharpens habits, and builds a deeper sense of accountability, from the boiler room to the boardroom. Field Guide: Understanding the Language of Smart Buildings You’re going to hear a lot of terms in this chapter in the field. Some sound like they came from an IT department. Some feel like buzzwords. And some are now central to how buildings operate, whether you like it or not. Let’s get you fluent. Digital Twin: A live digital replica of a physical building. It mirrors everything from HVAC performance to occupancy trends using real-time data, allowing teams to test, troubleshoot, and optimize systems virtually. Machine Learning: A type of AI where software learns from patterns in data to improve performance without being explicitly programmed. In buildings, it powers predictive maintenance, energy forecasting, and optimization. Predictive Maintenance: Fixing things before they break. By analyzing sensor data over time, systems can forecast failure risks and flag issues before they turn into costly outages. Optimization Algorithms: Software that continuously adjusts building systems, such as lighting, heating, or cooling, based on inputs like occupancy, weather, or energy price signals, to reduce waste and improve comfort. Real-Time Dashboard: A visual platform showing what the building is doing right now. From energy use to indoor air quality to occupancy levels, it puts performance on display for operators, tenants, and even investors. Submetering: Measuring specific parts of a building’s energy use, such as individual tenants, HVAC zones, or plug loads. This enables more precise tracking, accountability, and cost allocation. Fault Detection and Diagnostics (FDD): Systems that automatically detect when something goes wrong, such as a stuck damper or a sensor out of range, and diagnose the cause. Think of it as a building with a built in mechanic. Carbon-Linked Lease: A lease agreement that holds both landlord and tenant accountable for a building’s carbon performance. May include usage caps, shared targets, and real-time data access. Interoperability: The ability of different building systems and software platforms to communicate and work together. Without it, data stays stuck in silos and smart systems become dumb fast. Governance by Algorithm: When software makes decisions, adjusting temperature, routing power, or controlling airflow, someone has to take responsibility for those decisions. This is the emerging conversation about oversight in semi autonomous buildings. IoT (Internet of Things): Devices embedded with sensors and connectivity that collect and exchange data. In buildings, these include thermostats, light sensors, occupancy counters, and more, all feeding the system’s brain. Continuous Commissioning: Ongoing tuning of building systems, not just once at occupancy, but every day, to make sure performance does not drift over time. Cyber-Physical System: A building where physical infrastructure (like HVAC or lighting) is deeply integrated with digital systems. It’s not just connected. It’s intelligent. AI-Driven Controls: Control systems that use artificial intelligence to make smarter decisions in real time, adapting settings automatically for comfort, efficiency, or carbon reduction. Behavioral Analytics: Using data to understand how occupants interact with the building, how they use space, energy, and amenities, to improve design, engagement, and efficiency. Case Studies:  Tools to Create Smart Buildings The smart building revolution was supposed to be for everyone. For years, it was not. It was for Class A towers and trophy campuses with glass curtain walls and enterprise IT budgets. It was for buildings that could afford to be smart. Everyone else was left behind, including the middle of the market such as five story office buildings in St. Louis, mid-rise structures in Newark or garden apartments in Phoenix. Many buildings in this class do not have building management systems. Many do not even have internet in the boiler room. When policies changed and cities like Washington, D.C. began enforcing carbon caps and performance mandates, middle market buildings faced fines they could not afford for problems they could not measure. That is the gap Titanium stepped into. It is where their technology is rewriting the rules. Instead of forcing legacy building management systems into buildings that were never wired for them, Titanium reimagined the system from scratch. Their platform combines rugged wireless sensors, cloud native controls, and preconfigured automation into a plug and play kit for buildings of all shapes and sizes: no trenching, no network cabling, no shutdown of facilities. You install it and the building wakes up. The results are hard to ignore. At Jefferson Marketplace in Washington, D.C., the property was facing a potential half million dollar fine under the city’s energy performance standards. Titanium’s platform enabled a full building retrofit without opening walls or writing custom code. Electricity use dropped by a third. Natural gas use fell by twenty percent. Operating costs declined by forty-five thousand dollars per year. Utility rebates covered another sixty-nine thousand dollars in savings. Most importantly, the building met its compliance targets with no fine, no scramble, and no surprises. Jefferson is just one address. In cities like Boston, Portland, and San Francisco, Titanium is proving that building intelligence can scale. In one San Francisco high rise, their leak detection system monitors nearly two thousand potential failure points across thirty-five floors. The system covers everything from elevator pits to mechanical closets and fire risers - anywhere water can go rogue. The sensors are wireless, fire rated, and designed for places without power or Wi Fi. When something goes wrong, the response is automatic. Alerts are sent out. Systems shut down. Valves close remotely. In one building alone, the system has already prevented what could have been millions of dollars in damage and weeks of tenant displacement. This is not just a maintenance story. It is an energy story. Titanium’s platform can respond to utility signals in real time, allowing buildings to shed load, shift usage, and participate in grid programs without batteries, aggregators, or middlemen. In Portland, one multifamily building enrolled directly in a utility demand response program. When the grid needed support, the building delivered without tenant disruption or staff intervention. In Boston, another property qualified for a battery incentive program through software control alone. This is what it looks like when buildings stop being passive loads and start becoming active energy assets. Visibility is built in. Titanium’s live dashboards track everything from kilowatts to carbon, from uptime to maintenance tickets. Owners do not just receive alerts: They get context on how the building performs against local mandates and how it compares to portfolio targets and aligns with financial covenants. The data feeds investor reports, sustainability disclosures and performance linked financing models. Security is treated as infrastructure, not an afterthought. Titanium’s system is SOC 2 Type II compliant, with encrypted communications, user level access controls, and full audit trails. This is accountability designed for real assets at portfolio scale. What makes this story different is not only what the technology does. It is who it serves. Titanium is not building for the next glass tower in Hudson Yards. It is building for the properties already standing. It can accommodate buildings with tenants and sites with aging equipment. The advantage is the upgrade is affordable to buildings without the budget for a traditional digital transformation. Titanium flips the old hierarchy on its head. It brings intelligence to buildings that were never expected to have it, democratizing control, automation, and insight. In doing so, it redefines what the smart building revolution could actually mean. The future of real estate is not just smarter buildings. It is smarter portfolios. Every square foot. Every system. Every tenant. Platforms like Titanium are making that future finally feel evenly distributed. Beyond the Anchor: Three Signals from the Smart Frontier Not every leap in smart building innovation comes from a retrofit. Some changes are coming from the software layer while others involve rethinking the building from scratch. Others from reimagining the relationship between academia, operations, and data. Three stories show where the frontier is heading next. Adaptis.ai: The Algorithm as Engineer Where most platforms react to data, Adaptis builds simulations from it. Their AI engine uses digital twins and predictive modeling to help designers test and optimize building systems long before concrete is poured. The software learns from thousands of prior scenarios, including climate profiles, usage patterns, and system configurations, and offers adaptive design guidance that evolves with each input. It is not replacing engineers. It is giving them co-intelligence, a second layer of automated analysis. In a recent pilot with a major developer, Adaptis helped reduce projected energy loads by eighteen percent and identified HVAC synergies that would have been missed using static models. The value was not just savings. It was speed. Weeks were cut from design iterations, with fewer change orders later on. Edge Amsterdam: Where the Building Writes Back At the Edge, intelligence is not a layer. It is the structure. This Amsterdam office tower is one of the most sensor rich commercial buildings in the world. Every desk, every room, and every system feeds into a central brain that adjusts temperature, lighting, and ventilation in real time based on occupancy and personal preferences. Employees book desks through an app. Lights follow them from room to room. The building optimizes its own cleaning schedules based on traffic patterns. It is not just occupant friendly. It is exceptionally efficient. The Edge uses seventy percent less electricity than a typical office of its size and produces more energy than it consumes. 370 Jay Street, NYU: From Classroom to Control Room At 370 Jay Street in Brooklyn, NYU transformed a former MTA building into a living laboratory. The facility serves as academic space and as a testing ground for building intelligence and resilience strategies. Sensors track lighting, air quality, occupancy, and system response. The building’s data infrastructure supports coursework, research, and pilot studies on smart systems. It is not just a building. It is curriculum. It is also a model for how universities can turn operations into insight. These projects differ in scale, geography, and use, but they point to the same conclusion. Smart is not a style. It is not a dashboard. It is a way of thinking about buildings as living systems can learn, adapt, and eventually lead. 1 Chao Ding, et al. Potential of artificial intelligence in reducing energy and carbon emissions of commercial buildings at scale, Nature Communications. 15: 5916. 2024 2 Jack Ngarambe, et al, The use of artificial intelligence methods in the prediction of thermal comfort in buildings: Energy implications of AI-based thermal comfort controls. Energy and Buildings: March 15, 2020 3 Mischos, Stavros, Eleanna Dalagdi, and Dimitrios Vrakas. 2023. “Intelligent Energy Management Systems: A Review.” Artificial Intelligence Review 56, no. 10 (October): 11635–74. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10441-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10441-3</a>. 4 <a href="https://www.aceee.org/blog-post/2025/11/smart-building-systems-are-cutting-energy-waste-and-ai-making-them-even-smarter" target="_blank">https://www.aceee.org/blog-post/2025/11/smart-building-systems-are-cutting-energy-waste-and-ai-making-them-even-smarter</a> 5 Qiang, G., S. Tang., J. Hao., L. Di Sarno., G. Wu., and R. Ren. 2023. “Building Automation Systems for Energy and Comfort Management in Green Buildings: A Critical Review and Future Directions.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy reviews, 179, 113301. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113301</a> 6 Kramer, H., G. Lin, C. Curtin, E. Crowe, and J. Granderson. 2020. “Proving the Business Case for Building Analytics.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, October. https://doi.org/10.20357/B7G022. 7 <a href="https://www.aceee.org/topic-brief/2025/11/unlocking-energy-savings-using-building-energy-management-control-systems" target="_blank">https://www.aceee.org/topic-brief/2025/11/unlocking-energy-savings-using-building-energy-management-control-systems</a> 8 Berkeley Lab (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory). 2021. “A Primer on Organizational Use of Energy Management and Information Systems (EMIS).” Second edition. Better Buildings. U.S. Department of Energy. https://betterbuildingssolutioncenter.energy.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/EMIS_Primer_Org anizational_Use.pdf. 9 Zhao, L., H. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, and T. Li. 2025. “A Digital-Twin Evaluation Framework of Zero Carbon Buildings for Existing Residential Buildings Based on Scan-to-BIM.” Alexandria Engineering Journal 124: 204–213. 10 Ali, D. M. T. E., V. Motuzienė, and R. Džiugaitė-Tumėnienė. 2024. “AI-Driven Innovations in Building energy management systems: A review of potential applications and energy Savings.” Energies 17 (17): 4277. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4277. 11 <a href="https://commercialobserver.com/2025/08/new-yorks-ai-building-systems-inspections-the-same-as-fire-systems/" target="_blank">https://commercialobserver.com/2025/08/new-yorks-ai-building-systems-inspections-the-same-as-fire-systems/</a>

AI and The Smart Building Revolution

Explore Programs

Experience SPS

Join Us

About SPS

Info For

Connect